Existing reporting guidelines for clinical trials are not completely relevant for implantable medical devices: a systematic review - Université Paris-Saclay Access content directly
Journal Articles Journal of Clinical Epidemiology Year : 2017

Existing reporting guidelines for clinical trials are not completely relevant for implantable medical devices: a systematic review

Anne-France Motte
  • Function : Author
Stéphanie Diallo
  • Function : Author
Constance Châteauvieux
  • Function : Author
Carole Serrano
  • Function : Author
Carole Naud
  • Function : Author
Julie Steelandt
  • Function : Author
Jean-Marc Alsac
  • Function : Author
Pierre Aubry
  • Function : Author
Florence Cour
  • Function : Author
Olivier Pellerin
  • Function : Author
Judith Pineau
  • Function : Author
Patrice Prognon
  • Function : Author
Isabelle Borget
  • Function : Author
Brigitte Bonan
  • Function : Author

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine relevant items for reporting clinical trials on implantable medical devices (IMDs) and to identify reporting guidelines which include these items.
Not file

Dates and versions

hal-03390336 , version 1 (21-10-2021)

Identifiers

Cite

Anne-France Motte, Stéphanie Diallo, Hélène van den Brink, Constance Châteauvieux, Carole Serrano, et al.. Existing reporting guidelines for clinical trials are not completely relevant for implantable medical devices: a systematic review. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2017, 91, pp.111-120. ⟨10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.07.005⟩. ⟨hal-03390336⟩
11 View
0 Download

Altmetric

Share

Gmail Facebook Twitter LinkedIn More